Many knowledgeable researchers have pet subjects. They possess a vast experience, which newcomers to the field lack. Here, experienced researchers can in an informal way issue advice related to these pet subjects.
For instance, you may be able to warn others against certain pitfalls and common mistakes.
Do you feel that certain issues are under-exposed and should be more widely communicated to the atmospheric modelling community?
Here is your chance to do something about it!
Write an article here on the web. How? Make a link to it from the current page, and possibly also from other relevant pages. As the present page grows, it will be re-structured, and pertinent links will be added.
See also: Rules of conduct for the Atmospheric Dispersion Web site.
Links to articles[]
Below is an annotated list maintained by the authors.
Note that you can also find an alphabetic list of all pages in the "Pet topics" category through the relevant Category Page.
- Why is model evaluation difficult? Views on model evaluation - by Helge Rørdam Olesen, NERI
- Striking discrepancy between NO2 limit values in EU versus USA Food for thought - contribution by Helge Rørdam Olesen, NERI, based on work by Rex Britter.
- Pitfalls related to quality assurance of dispersion models A list of pitfalls - based on work done within the so-called COST 732 action on quality assurance of micrometeorological dispersion models.
- How to ensure that PowerPoint presentations run smoothly Not particularly related to atmospheric dispersion - but useful advice based on many unfortunate experiences - by Helge Rørdam Olesen, NERI